Nico Hulkenberg’s Crash at Abu Dhabi ( x )
Well which team is in 9th place in the constructor championship now? Google doesn’t have the answer to that!
Belgium GP: Driver Preview Quotes – http://formula1insider78.blogspot.com/2018/08/belgian-gp-driver-preview-quotes.html
As revealed last night by Motorsport.com,
the FIA and owners of the former Force India team have been working
hard in recent days to create a new entry and new team for the
Following intense scrutiny of the legal
situation surrounding the takeover of the Force India team by a
consortium led by Lawrence Stroll, the FIA has subsequently approved an
It means the former Force India entry has been
officially annulled, with the FIA ruling that the team is excluded from
the world championship with immediate effect. This action forfeits its
constructors’ championship points.
Point’s team principal Otmar Szafnauer said: “The new Racing Point
Force India Team is delighted to be able to race when the championship
resumes in Belgium this weekend.
“This heralds a new and exciting
chapter for us. Just a few weeks ago, an uncertain future lay ahead,
with more than 400 jobs at risk; now the new team has the backing of a
consortium of investors, led by Lawrence Stroll, who believe in us as a
team, in our expertise and in our potential to achieve success on the
“We are grateful to the FIA, the Joint Administrators and
Formula One Management for their support in helping us achieve such a
welcome outcome and ultimately, we trust, for the sport and its many
FIA president Jean Todt added: “I am very pleased that a
strong, positive outcome has been reached and welcome the mid-season
entry of Racing Point Force India.
“Creating an environment of
financial stability in Formula One is one of the key challenges faced by
the sport, however thanks to the hard work of the FIA, the Joint
Administrators, Racing Point and Formula One Management we have a
situation now that safeguards the future for all of the highly-talented
employees, and will maintain the fair and regulated championship
competition for the second half of the season.”
Chemical firm Uralkali is closely associated with Dmitry Mazepin, father of GP3 racer and Force India test driver Nikita Mazepin.
Mazepin Sr is its deputy chairman of the board of directors, as well as chairman of holding company Uralchem.
In a statement issued on Tuesday, Uralkali said that it “considers that the process conducted by the Administrator may not be in the best interests of Force India creditors and other stakeholders, and the sport in general.”
However, the administrators – Geoff Rowley and Jason Baker of FRP Advisory – have responded by saying that all bidders for the team were treated equally.
“All bidders were given equal opportunity to submit the best deal for Force India,” they said in a statement. “Throughout, we (the Joint Administrators) have closely followed our statutory duties and objectives as administrators and had the advice of experienced legal counsel.”
Uralkali says that it “assembled a team of professionals (including lawyers, accountants, insolvency experts and a Formula 1 specialist) to prepare and submit a competitive bid for Force India, which was led by Uralkali`s independent director Paul J. Ostling.”
Although not named, it is understood that the specialist was former McLaren team principal Martin Whitmarsh.
The statement explained in some detail the timeline of Uralkali’s bid and its interactions with the administrators.
The company noted that “over the course of the bidding process and discussions with the Administrator, Uralkali insisted on a transparent and fair process to ensure equal opportunities for each bidder.
"In particular, Uralkali proposed that the bidding process be conducted by way of the submission in sealed envelopes of best and final bids to be opened in the presence of appointed representatives of the interested bidders. However, this proposal was rejected by the Administrators.”
In essence, Uralkali points out that the timeline for submitting bids was not achievable, especially as consent for any agreement was required from 13 Indian banks because of a freezing injunction on the assets of the original shareholders.
It says: “Upon our discussions with the shareholder representatives, it became apparent to us that the rescue option (at least on the conditions and within the time frames put forward to us by the Administrator and consistent with our own code of integrity) was not achievable due to the complexity of legal structure, the extended period of time required to obtain consents of the 13 Indian banks and to obtain approval of a UK court for an amendment to the freezing injunction.
"Uralkali submitted a restated proposal on August 6, 2018 which, due to the above reasons, no longer offered a rescue option but set out a very attractive proposal to purchase business and assets of Force India on a going concern basis.”
The statement concludes: “Following the submission of our proposal, the administrator refused to engage with Uralkali team, did not reply to phone calls and emails and communicated with Uralkali in a single email following close of business on August 7, 2018 that it had entered into an exclusivity arrangement with another bidder regarding a proposal to rescue the company.
"Despite expiration of the deadline set by the Administrator, no rescue plan was submitted to the court for approval, which confirmed Uralkali’s view that the rescue option was not achievable in the timeline and under conditions proposed by the Administrator.
"Under these circumstances, it is surprising that no attempt was made by the Administrator to engage with Uralkali with respects to its bid for the assets and business of Force India.”